While examining both
Abrahamic and Eastern approaches to death this week, several similarities and
differences were observed. Concepts of judgment after death differ greatly
between worldviews, and the question of postmortem judgment is not easily
answered in unison. Specifically, while Islam and
Buddhism both account for one’s merits and good deeds in life, the concept of
judgment after death differs drastically.
Islam, heavily influenced by
Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, and Hanifs, follows the general
Abrahamic tradition of an ultimate judgment day. As human, one is exiled onto
the Earth, goes into the Earth once dead, and is raised from the Earth when the
day of resurrection comes forth.
“When the sun ceases to shine; when the stars fall
down and the mountains are blown away; when camels big with young are left
untended and the wild beasts are brought together; when the seas are set alight
and men’s souls are reunited; when the infant girl, buried alive, is asked for
what crime she was slain; when the records of men’s deeds are laid open and the
heaven is stripped bare; when Hell burns fiercely and Paradise is brought near:
then each soul shall know what it has done.” (from the Qur’an, The Cessation)
In Islam, God not only places
one onto the Earth, but furthermore decides how long one should stay for, and
when and if one can “return.” (Note that this gives further reason to worship
God, as he controls one’s life and ultimatum.) On the last day, the book of man is laid
wide open for judgment, and while this can be interpreted as a small window of
opportunity to prove one deserves “salvation, ” the decision of going into
barzakh (an intermediate state) or heaven or hell is left in the hands of a
higher being to judge. Until judgment day, Islamic people invoke the 5 Pillars
of Islam, involving a ritualized prayer, in the hopes of achieving a positive
postmortem judgment.
Buddhism, however, follows an
objective approach to postmortem judgment.
All is deemed transient, and because of this, permanence is an illusion.
Immediately, we see the contrast from Islam, as no higher being controls the
ultimatum. The universe and its energy has overruled that all must end
eventually in the cycle of life. Instead, one can take a (determined) path to
cessation if one follows the Eightfold Path, which includes eight specific
“good” life practices. One can strive for good karma by doing good and avoiding
harm, with the hopes that good will come back to oneself eventually. Furthermore,
Buddhist aim to ultimately achieve Nirvana, which represents the extinguishing
of desire, anger, and ignorance.
Amongst the contrasts of the
two traditions, one significant quality they share is the sense of
helplessness. To an extent, both practitioners of Islamic and Buddhist faiths
follow the idea that their ending lies in the hands of something bigger than
the individual. However, the two differ
in how they respectively approach the inability to control their fates.
No comments:
Post a Comment